top of page
DTS_LIVE_NOW_JELLY_LUISE_Photos_ID11739.jpg

SUBCULTURES IN THE AGE OF THE ALGORITHM

Culture | Written: Wairimu Njoroge

12.11.25

Evolving from family crests to designer symbols, logos have always been used to communicate transaction, status and privilege. They promise identity and belonging. However, we find that sometimes it just doesn’t seem to fit. 

 

Historically, subcultures were born out of resistance, collective expressions of identity that stood in contrast to the mainstream (Adams, 2015). Today, however, the boundaries have blurred. Digital spaces, globalisation, and commercialisation have reshaped how communities form, express, and sustain themselves (Cai, 2024).

PHOTO | DEATH TO STOCK | JELLY LUISE

To assume subcultures could remain static would ignore the very essence of their nature, an inherent capacity to evolve in response to shifting social and cultural landscapes. In the digital age, the landscape of cultural expression continues to transform, with aesthetics once considered subcultural now adopted into the mainstream. Subcultures serve as the basis for individual identity and group solidarity which leads to social integration and intergroup dynamics. So what does that look like within today’s landscape? ​​

​

In today’s society, the visual expression of subcultures has evolved. Traditionally, appearance signalled belonging to a subcultural group. A visible marker of shared identity, values, and resistance. Now, the homogenising forces of mass media and digital connectivity have distilled these meanings into surface-level aesthetics. The deeper cultural and ideological significance once embedded in subcultural style has been overshadowed, often reduced to a matter of appearance. What once embodied social or political statements has shifted toward simply “looking the part,” without necessarily sharing the same beliefs.

 

The line between authentic self-expression and performative display has grown increasingly blurred, reflecting a broader cultural pressure to conform. As subcultural aesthetics are absorbed by the mainstream, their relationship to popular culture becomes increasingly commercialised (Cai, 2024). This shift has also lowered the level of personal commitment required to participate. Individuals can now fluidly move between multiple subcultures without the deep immersion once demanded.

 

Fashion subcultures exemplify this transformation. Distinct styles once expressed shared interests, identities, and ideologies, think goth, punk, grunge, bohemian, or mod. Today, these aesthetics circulate freely through trends and algorithms, detached from their original contexts yet continually reinvented through new forms of cultural expression (Libunao, 2025).​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

This redefinition reflects a broader societal shift, one centred on identity, belonging, and consumption. Contemporary culture has become more hybrid and performative than the traditional subcultures that preceded it.

 

Where there was once a demand for deep alignment and shared ideology, today’s landscape prioritises flexibility and self-curation over allegiance.

 

The communal foundations that once defined subcultures have shifted toward imagery and aesthetics, reflecting how identity is now communicated through digital interfaces rather than face-to-face connection (Libunao, 2025).

 

Meanwhile, the adoption and commodification of subcultural symbols by brands and media have transformed them into marketable trends. What was once oppositional and countercultural has become integrated into,  and even fuelled by consumer culture.

​​

Subcultures matter because they act as incubators for innovation. Spaces where the boundaries of cultural norms are tested, stretched, and reimagined. They influence the way we think about identity, creativity, and belonging, leaving lasting impressions on fashion, art, and music. Through their experimentation, we are invited to rethink diversity of thought, lifestyle, and expression. To see culture not as fixed, but as constantly evolving through dialogue and resistance.

​

Even as much of culture has migrated online, new mediums and expressions continue to rise both within and beyond the digital landscape. The resurgence of vinyl within music subcultures, for instance, reflects a growing nostalgia for tactility and a renewed desire for deeper, more embodied engagement with art. This revival is not just about sound quality, but about the ritual and experience that surround it. The act of collecting, listening, and connecting through something physical in an increasingly immaterial world. In many ways, such movements signal a quiet resistance to the speed and disposability of digital culture, reaffirming subcultures’ enduring role as sites of authenticity, experimentation, and cultural renewal.

​

 

Throughout the evolution of subcultures, cultural homogenisation has risen. With the reach of mainstream media and commercialisation of subcultural symbols, the distinctness that once allowed something to stand out has been diluted. The digital age has in turn expanded the cultural symbols but they have been repackaged and sit more with aesthetics than shared interest or identity.  

[ READ MORE HERE ]

Bibliography:

bottom of page